Early this week, the growing New York Corporate Social Responsibility Group got together for another montly meetup - May CSR Social at our favorite Honey Bar and Lounge in Chelsea. In addition to being the only regular informal after-work place to network with other corporate social responsibility and sustainability professionals in the City, the New York CSR Meetup offers an increasingly engaging, diverse and thought-provoking forum for discussing the hottest topics in this field. The topic of May CSR Social was Communicating CSR: Option, law or strategy? We started out by aknowledging the currently ongoing debate around the most effective means of communicating corporate responsibility practices. Many think CSR reports are the best means, others think genuine corporate leadership voices are increasingly influential in bringing about change. Yet others believe that the future of CSR communications is in telling the story in video format. The discussion was extremely interesting and here are some highlights I want to share with you:
1. CSR reporting is very much alive and rapidly evolving. The more tailored the report to its target audiences, the better. The more focus on core issues, the better. The more evidence of actual work/process/results, the better. The shorter, concise and straightforward, the better.
2. Regulated CSR reporting is unlikely in the US. Shareholders, employees and customers should be able to require the most appropriate form of CSR communication. Whatever the format, CSR communicaiton should address the real issues facing the company and would ensure a two-way communication process. Of 14 group members, only 2 would were in favor of mandatory CSR reporting.
3. Effective communication is a two-way road. Companies should learn to listen to and act upon stakeholders' perceptions, including complaints and criticism from local communities and various segments of customers. Shareholders should use their right to issue resolutions more often. If none of these works, government will eventually impose stricter rules such as the latest automobile emission and mileage standards.4. Finally, an open-ended question that you are welcome to answer as well: Why Citi's and Barclays' reports are so different in their scope and focus in the same global context? While Citi's report provides a comprehensive coverage of everything except its approach to mitigate the adverse impact of the financial crisis on its customers, Barclays' report - which is in a much better shape than Citi - is all about that.

